Justice Stella Arach-Amoko’s body being carried into parliament on Wednesday
The family of the late Supreme court judge Stella Arach Amoko has split over her final resting place. Amoko, who served in the judiciary for 26 years, passed away at Nakasero hospital over the weekend aged 69.
However, controversy has emerged after three burial grounds were suggested by her two families and the cultural leader. Her husband, ambassador Idule Amoko submitted a letter to the judiciary requesting that she be buried in Adjumani district while her paternal family insists on Nebbi district, all in northern Uganda.
As a result, two parallel burial programs were issued, with one indicating Nebbi as the burial site and the other indicating Adjumani. In a June 19 petition addressed to the judiciary permanent secretary, Dr Pius Bigirimana, the family members, including the biological sister, brother, and daughters of the deceased, expressed their desire for Amoko to be buried in Nebbi, specifically at Jukiya Hill Ward, Juba cell, where her father was laid to rest.
“This is the humble petition of the biological family of the deceased Hon. Lady Justice Stella Arach Amoko against the alleged decision to bury our deceased sister and mother in Adjumani, praying for your good office to overturn the alleged decision and to have our said mother and sister buried at her home in Nebbi where her father was buried as she wished,” reads part of the petition.
The family argues that the deceased had verbally expressed her wish to be buried in Nebbi near her father’s grave prior to her passing. They state that while still at Nakasero hospital, she invited her brother, from Nebbi and shared her desire to be buried there.
“…to this effect, the deceased while still at Nakasero hospital, invited her biological brother one Picho Godfrey to come from Nebbi and expressed her wish to be buried in Nebbi,” the family contends in the petition.
Additionally, the family asserts that the children have no connection to Adjumani, their paternal ancestral home, and have never been introduced to the place or shown any land or property there.
On another note, Kaal Ker Kwaro Jonam Kapita, the cultural institution of the Jonam, released a June 19 statement to the judiciary stating that Arach be laid to rest at the royal burial grounds at Kaal Ragem in Pakwach district.
They urged the judiciary to respect Amoko’s wish to be buried next to her father in Nebbi. Unconfirmed reports suggest that the decision to bury Arach was made during a meeting to accord her a state funeral at the president’s office, from which the children and relatives claim they were excluded. This is not the first case in which families have disagreed over the burial site of a deceased person.
In 2021, the family division of the High court in Kampala had to decide on the burial site of city lawyer Bob Kasango following a dispute between Kasango’s widow Nice Bitarabeho, and his paternal family from Tororo district. Trouble started after some of his relatives from Tororo grabbed his casket from All Saints Cathedral-Kampala, where it had been announced, after a funeral service, that the deceased would be buried in Fort Portal.
Police intercepted the casket and returned it to the funeral home to allow for discussions between the conflicting parties. As a result, the widow applied for a court order to bury the deceased in Kabarole district on the grounds that he had denounced his family and never wished to be buried in his ancestral home.
She told the court that Kasango was never close to his family members in life, let alone his mother, Rose Kabise, who was fighting to stop the burial in Tooro. She also told the court that one of the family members had confided in her that the family in Tororo had wanted to kill Kasango when he was still young, as a result of family wrangles. Kasango’s mother Rose Kabise told the court that Kasango was born to a Musoga father, Livingston Richard Kasimo, and raised by his stepfather Bonaventure Okello, a Japadhola from Tororo.
She, however, explained that Kasimo died many years ago and, she heard that he had been buried somewhere in Bulemeezi where he had bought a piece of land. Kabise added that Kasango had bought her land in Tororo, and that is where she wanted her son to be buried.
In her judgment, justice Lydia Mugambe Ssali ruled in favour of the widow, saying that Kasango did not have a strong attachment to his parents, pointing to the fact that the mother-in-law remained unknown to the widow and the deceased’s failure to recognize Kabise at their wedding.
Justice Mugambe also explained that both the widow and children had no attachment to the family in Tororo, and the fact that Kabise only visited Kasango at Bitarabeho’s invitation. She also noted that during the hearing of the matter, Kasango’s eldest son said that they were comfortable burying their father in Fort Portal.
Source: The Observer
Share this content: